It was the first time retroactive relief was provided to a group of
inmates who most likely would have received significantly shorter terms
if they had been sentenced under current drug laws, sentencing rules and
charging policies.
Most of the eight will be released in 120 days.
In a statement, Mr. Obama said that each of the eight men and women had
been sentenced under what is now recognized as an “unfair system,”
including under a 100-to-1 sentencing disparity between crack and powder
cocaine offenses that was significantly reduced by the Fair Sentencing
Act of 2011.
“If they had been sentenced under the current law, many of them would
have already served their time and paid their debt to society,” Mr.
Obama said. “Instead, because of a disparity in the law that is now
recognized as unjust, they remain in prison, separated from their
families and their communities, at a cost of millions of taxpayer
dollars each year.”
The recipients include several high-profile inmates who have received
news media attention as examples of the effects of earlier
tough-on-crime drug sentencing policies, in which the quantities of
crack involved sometimes resulted in severe punishments. Many of them
were young at the time of their offense and were not accused of
violence.
Clarence Aaron of Mobile, Ala., for example, was sentenced to three life
terms in prison for his role in a 1993 drug deal, when he was 22. Mr.
Aaron’s case has been taken up by congressional critics of draconian
sentencing and by civil rights groups, and has received significant media attention. Last year, the Justice Department’s inspector general issued a report criticizing the department’s pardon office for mishandling his clemency petition.
Margaret Love, a former Justice Department pardon lawyer who represents
Mr. Aaron, said she received a call informing her of the decision on
Thursday morning and called her client, who along with his family was
“very grateful.”
“He was absolutely overcome,” she said. “Actually, I was, too. He was in
tears. This has been a long haul for him, 20 years. He just was
speechless, and it’s very exciting.”
Mr. Obama, who has made relatively little use of his constitutional
clemency powers to forgive offenses or reduce sentences, is also
expected to pardon 13 people who completed their sentences long ago.
Those cases involved mostly minor offenses that resulted in little or no
prison time, in line with previous pardons he has issued.
But the eight commutations opened a major new front in the
administration’s criminal justice policy intended to curb soaring
taxpayer spending on prisons and to help correct what the administration
has portrayed as unfairness in the justice system.
Recipients also include Reynolds Wintersmith, of Rockford, Ill., who was
sentenced in 1994 to life in prison for dealing crack when he was 17,
and Stephanie George of Pensacola, Fla., who received a life sentence in
1997, when she was 27, for hiding a boyfriend’s stash of crack in a box
in her house. In both cases, the sentencing judges criticized the
mandatory sentences they were required to impose by federal law at the
time, calling them unjust.
In December 2012, The New York Times published an article
about Ms. George’s case and the larger rethinking of the social and
economic costs of long prison terms for nonviolent offenders. Mr. Obama
mentioned the article in an interview with Time magazine later that day and said he was considering asking officials about ways to do things “smarter.”
Around that time, a senior White House official said, Mr. Obama directed
Kathryn Ruemmler, his White House counsel, to ask the Justice
Department to examine pending clemency petitions to assess whether there
were any in which current inmates serving long sentences would have
benefited from subsequent changes to sentencing laws and policy.
The deputy attorney general, James M. Cole, returned the eight cases
with positive recommendations from the department about six weeks ago,
the official said.
The possibility of retroactively reducing sentences for nonviolent
offenders who were sentenced under the old system comes against the
backdrop of a growing pendulum swing against draconian mandatory minimum
sentences that led to an 800 percent increase in the number of
prisoners in the United States. With 5 percent of the world’s
population, the United States has about 25 percent of its inmates.
Amid crime rates that have plunged to the lowest levels in four decades
and soaring costs to taxpayers to incarcerate large numbers of
nonviolent offenders, a sentencing reform movement — led by states including the conservative-leaning Texas and South Carolina — has gained momentum and is now reaching the federal level. In the federal system, the need to house the swelling ranks of prisoners
— at a cost of about $26,000 each a year, according to government
figures — is consuming an ever-larger amount of the Justice Department’s
budget. In 2000, taxpayers spent $4.2 billion on federal prisons, or 27
percent of the department’s budget. This year, that has swollen to $7.9
billion. By 2020, a recent analysis showed, it is projected to be $10.1
billion and 40 percent of the budget.
In addition to the reduction in mandatory minimum sentences for crack
offenses established by the Fair Sentencing Act, Attorney General Eric
H. Holder Jr. in August instructed prosecutors
to omit listing quantities of illicit substances in indictments for
low-level drug offenses in order to avoid setting off strict mandatory
minimum sentences. He also ordered prosecutors to recharge pending cases to bring them in line with that policy.
But the moves left unanswered what, if anything, to do about federal
inmates whose cases were already completed and who are serving long
sentences under the older system of mandatory minimum sentences. The
harsh sentencing laws were imposed amid a wave of crack-related violence
and fear of crime a generation ago.
Legislation pending in Congress, including a bill co-sponsored by
Senators Richard J. Durbin, Democrat of Illinois, and Mike Lee,
Republican of Utah, would make the Fair Sentencing Act retroactive for
some offenders, and it would build into the system a process for inmates
to apply to a judge for case-by-case review of whether a reduced
sentence would be appropriate.
The Obama administration supports that bill, the White House said, as a
more orderly and regular way to ensure individualized analysis in
addressing the broader inmate population.
According to the group Families Against Mandatory Minimums, about 8,800
federal inmates sentenced for crack offenses before the Fair Sentencing
Act would be eligible to apply for a reduced sentence were the bill to
become law.
“Commuting the sentences of these eight Americans is an important step
toward restoring fundamental ideals of justice and fairness,” Mr. Obama
said. “But it must not be the last. In the new year, lawmakers should
act on the kinds of bipartisan sentencing reform measures already
working their way through Congress. Together, we must ensure that our
taxpayer dollars are spent wisely, and that our justice system keeps its
basic promise of equal treatment for all.”
The other recipients of commutations were Ezell Gilbert of Tampa, Fla.,
who was sentenced to more than 24 years in 1997; Helen Alexander Gray of
Ty Ty, Ga., sentenced to 20 years in 1996; Jason Hernandez of McKinney,
Tex., who was sentenced to life in 1998; Ricky Eugene Patterson of Fort
Pierce, Fla., who was sentenced to life in 1995; and Billy Ray Wheelock
of Belton, Tex., who was sentenced to life in 1993.
Most will be released in 120 days to give the Bureau of Prisons and the
inmate time to plan for the release. Mr. Gilbert will be released
immediately because he was recently out of prison for a time, without
problems, during an appeal. Mr. Hernandez’s sentence was reduced to 20
years, so he will be released in 2018.
source: google
No comments:
Post a Comment